SB
Stellar Bancorp, Inc. (STEL)·Q2 2025 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- EPS of $0.51 beat S&P Global consensus of $0.446, driven by lower provision, disciplined opex, and modest noninterest income uplift; total revenue of $103.0M missed consensus $104.9M as higher funding costs and slightly lower average earning assets compressed NIM sequentially . EPS consensus and revenue consensus values marked with * (Values retrieved from S&P Global).
- NIM (tax-equivalent) of 4.18% (ex-PAA 3.95%) dipped 2 bps QoQ; cost of deposits rose to 1.97% (vs. 1.90% in Q1), with competitive money market pricing partially offset by brokers and reduced wholesale reliance .
- Originations nearly doubled QoQ (~$640M), supporting a return to organic loan growth in 2H 2025; deposits grew $111M QoQ with core mix improvement (MMDA & savings up, time down) and brokered deposits reduced to $163.2M .
- Credit remained benign: NPL ratio improved to 0.69% (from 0.75% QoQ), ACL/loans at 1.14%; provision fell to $1.1M and annualized NCOs remained ~0.01% .
- Capital and buybacks provide support: total capital ratio 15.98%; 791k shares repurchased at $26.08, while tangible book per share rose to $19.94 .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
What Went Well
- “New loan originations nearly doubled in the second quarter… highest level since 2022, and we believe it marks the return to organic growth” — CEO .
- Core deposit growth and mix: total deposits +$110.9M QoQ; MMDA & savings +$145.2M; brokered CDs reduced by ~$202M QoQ to $163.2M .
- Expense discipline and credit: noninterest expense essentially flat at ~$70.0M; provision down to $1.1M; NPL ratio improved and NCOs remained minimal .
What Went Wrong
- Revenue miss vs consensus: S&P Global consensus $104.9M* vs actual $103.0M*; modest NIM compression (4.18% vs 4.20%) as higher funding costs outweighed earning asset yields . EPS and revenue values marked with * (Values retrieved from S&P Global).
- Noninterest-bearing deposits ratio slipped to 36.71% (from 37.44%), and cost of funds rose to 2.02% QoQ amid competitive money market pricing .
- NPL level remains above prior-year Q2 (0.69% vs 0.66%), with office CRE continuing to warrant monitoring despite granular exposure and maturity dispersion .
Financial Results
Guidance Changes
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- “Our pipeline is healthy… new loan originations nearly doubling in the second quarter… we believe it marks the return to organic growth.” — CEO .
- “We are positioned to deliver positive operating leverage… and maintain a really strong balance sheet.” — CFO .
- “Second quarter margin… impacted by higher funding costs more than offsetting higher yields on earning assets… two basis point change versus the first quarter.” — CFO .
- “Second quarter benefited from Federal Reserve Bank dividends as a result of Stellar Bank becoming a member of the Federal Reserve System effective in April 2025.” — CFO .
Q&A Highlights
- Growth setup: Originations ~$640M; bar for net growth is to exceed payoffs and lift carried balances as unfunded commitments convert; expect H2 acceleration .
- Funding strategy: Reduced reliance on FHLB and brokered CDs; focus on core funding to defend margin amid competitive money market pricing .
- Expense posture: “Hold the line” to preserve optionality; opportunistic talent investments; back-office build post $10B threshold largely complete .
- Capital allocation: Buybacks price-sensitive; optionality to redeem additional sub debt considered; organic growth is primary use of capital .
- Securities/balance sheet: Maintain bonds roughly steady as % of assets; priority on loan growth while keeping liquid balance sheet .
Estimates Context
- EPS: Actual $0.51 vs S&P Global consensus $0.446* — bold beat driven by lower provision ($1.1M vs $3.6M in Q1), disciplined opex, and modest other income uplift from Fed dividends ($0.49M) . EPS consensus value marked with * (Values retrieved from S&P Global).
- Revenue: Actual $103.0M* vs S&P Global consensus $104.9M* — miss attributable to higher deposit and funding costs that modestly compressed NIM and slightly lower average earning assets . Revenue values marked with * (Values retrieved from S&P Global).
- Implication: Street may need to adjust FY margin and funding cost assumptions modestly higher, while EPS trajectory benefits from expense discipline and credit costs trending low.
Key Takeaways for Investors
- EPS beat with resilient NIM and tight credit costs; monitor funding mix as money market competition lifts deposit costs — near-term margin defense remains key .
- H2 2025 growth catalyst: originations doubled and pipelines improving; watch conversion of unfunded commitments and carried balances for acceleration .
- Capital deployment offers downside support: buybacks and potential sub debt redemption alongside strong CET1/Tier 1 leverage; tangible book compounding continues .
- Credit benign but keep an eye on office CRE; maturities well-laddered and nonowner/owner split diversified; NPL ratio has improved QoQ .
- Revenue miss underscores sensitivity to funding costs; any curve normalization or Fed cuts should structurally aid margins medium-term — CFO reiterated path to 4% core NIM ex-PAA .
- Deposit gathering remains a differentiator: strong net new accounts and core growth without leading on price; continued brokered reduction is margin-accretive over time .
- Tactical setup: Favor buy-on-weakness near funding-cost headlines; reassess into Q3/Q4 for confirmation of loan growth and margin trajectory with ongoing buyback support .